Perimeter Infill Walls: The Use of Bed Joint Reinforcement or RC Tie-Beams / Volume 20 / Masonry International papers / Masonry International / Publications / IMS Home - The International Masonry Society On-Line
About IMS Publications Forum Membership Annual Report Contact Us

IMS Home / Publications / Masonry Internati... / Masonry Internati... / Volume 20 / Perimeter Infill...

 

Home

News

Events

Publications

Codes & Standards

Directory Links

Website Support

Post Information

Members section

 

IMS publications...

Other IMS publica...

Masonry Internati...

Proceedings of Co...

Book reviews

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


* This site & contents copyright IMS

* Please see our Support Section for site help

 

Site By
Fresh Interactive

Perimeter Infill Walls: The Use of Bed Joint Reinforcement or RC Tie-Beams

Author

E.N. VINTZILEOU and V.A. PALIERAKI

Laboratory of Reinforced Concrete, Faculty of Civil Engineering, NationalTechnicalUniversity of Athens, Greece

Abstract

The contribution of infill walls to the seismic behaviour of RC structures is widely recognised. The reduction of in-plane and out-of-plane vulnerability of infill walls, as well as the limitation of negative effects of the frame-infill interaction, is a very important issue of public safety and economy. In this paper, the solution of reinforcing the infill walls is experimentally examined. Two alternative types of “reinforcement” are considered, namely the construction of an RC tie beam at mid-height of the infill and the arrangement of bed joint reinforcement (truss type reinforcement or metal lath). Brick masonry specimens (aspect ratio equal to 1.0 or 2.0) were tested either in diagonal compression or in out-of-plane bending. The results have proven that the use of truss type bed joint reinforcement offers the best performing solution against out-of-plane bending, as well as in case of in-plane shear, when the aspect ratio is equal to 1.0. In case of infills with an aspect ratio of 2.0, failure along a horizontal masonry joint could not be avoided for any type of reinforcement. In this paper, the experimental results obtained are presented and commented on.

Key words

Access to this paper

Members: you need to log-in to access [download] the full paper.

Non-members: You can access [download] this document by paying a small fee on-line - but why not consider the benefits of membership?

Price

£ 18.00

 

*MEMBERS* Login to access the full paper!

 

Navigation trail:

IMS Home / Publications / Masonry Internati... / Masonry Internati... / Volume 20 / Perimeter Infill...


Members login Lost password?

Latest News

ITW acquire Cullen Building Products

ITW (Illinois Tool Works) www.itw.com has acquired Cullen Building Products www.cullen-bp.com and its subsidiary companies in Canada, France and Ireland. The Glenrothes family business has established itself as a leading company in the development and manufacture of ancillary components for connecting timber to timber and timber to masonry. (11 November 2008)

New BS guide for specifying precast concrete masonry units

BS 6073-2_2008 Precast concrete masonry units. Guide for specifying precast concrete masonry units has just been published by BSI. It gives guidance on specifying precast concrete masonry units conforming to BS EN 771-3 and BS EN 771-4.

28/11/2008 ~ Comparing design outcomes from EC6 with design outcomes from BS 5628

All engineers who design masonry buildings are welcome to this event. Registration is free but essential.

Latest Forum Topics: general

: